The Giants of Sales

What Dale Carnegie, John Patterson, Elmer Wheeler, and Joe Girard Can Teach You About Real Sales Success

By Tom Sant

AMACOM

Copyright © 2006 Tom Sant
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-8144-1598-6

Contents

Preface, ix,
PART ONE SELLING IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY,
1 • Stating the Obvious, 3,
2 • Four Ways to Sell, 15,
PART TWO JOHN HENRY PATTERSON: THE PROCESS OF SELLING,
3 • Desperate in Dayton, 25,
4 • A Primer on Process, 37,
5 • Patterson’s Legacy, 53,
6 • The Pros and Cons of Sales as a Process, 65,
7 • Making It Work for You, 78,
PART THREE DALE CARNEGIE: THE APOSTLE OF INFLUENCE,
8 • The Young Man from Missouri, 85,
9 • The Carnegie Principles, 91,
10 • The 25-Year Overnight Success, 104,
11 • Carnegie’s Heirs, 110,
12 • Making It Work for You, 116,
PART FOUR ELMER WHEELER: THE MAGIC OF WORDS,
13 • Making Your Sales Sizzle, 123,
14 • Thinking and Buying, 128,
15 • Wheeler’s Deal, 137,
16 • The Language-Based Approach Today, 153,
17 • Making It Work for You, 162,
PART FIVE JOE GIRARD: PRIMING THE PUMP,
18 • Down and Out in Detroit City, 171,
19 • Finding the Law of 250 at a Funeral, 177,
20 • From Network to Nurture, 183,
21 • The Pros and Cons of Priming the Pump, 193,
22 • Making It Work for You, 198,
PART SIX CONCLUSION,
23 • Looking Back to Look Ahead, 205,
Notes, 213,
Index, 223,

CHAPTER 1

STATING THE OBVIOUS

“People who ignore the past are doomed to repeat it.”

—George Santayana

Professional selling is the most important American invention of the twentieth century. It’s more important than the telephone, the airplane, the computer, or any other mechanical or electronic innovation of the last century.

How can I say something so preposterous?

Because it’s true.

Because without knowing how to sell those other inventions effectively, the industries that were created around them would not have developed as quickly as they did. Without professional sales methods, the development of our society and our economy would have been delayed. It was professional selling skill that moved those products into the mainstream, making them a fundamental part of our infrastructure. In my view, professional selling is the engine that has powered our economy—and ultimately the economy of the world—for the past hundred years.

Our predecessors figured out how to sell effectively by figuring out what works. It didn’t happen in a laboratory or a research institute. It wasn’t motivated by abstract intellectual curiosity. It happened in the offices and shops and boardrooms where buying decisions were made on a daily basis. And it was motivated by the most pragmatic of issues: the need to close the deal.

John Henry Patterson, for example, developed a process for selling—a sequence of steps—that kept his company growing even in the midst of recessions, and that became the foundation for the methods used today by the most successful sales organizations in the world.

Dale Carnegie—yes, that Dale Carnegie—discovered truths about human relationships that have been used by such powerhouse business leaders as Lee Iacocca, Mary Kay Ash, and Tom Monahan to build businesses.

Elmer Wheeler developed and tested ways of delivering sales messages, boiled down to brief statements, to figure out which ways worked the best. He tested thousands of sentences on millions of people, tapping into fundamental truths about the way the brain works and how persuasion occurs.

And Joe Girard, born into abject poverty in the slums of Detroit, discovered a technique for generating qualified leads that put him in the Guinness Book of World Records as “the world’s greatest salesman.” By himself, working from a small office in a neighborhood Chevrolet dealer, selling to one buyer at a time, Girard sold more cars than 95 percent of all the dealerships in North America. In one day he sold 18 cars, in one month he sold 174, and in a 14-year career he sold more than 13,000!

The principles that these people discovered still work today, because they are rooted in fundamental human psychology. I know they work because I used them to build my own business. I’ve used them to help my clients. And I have seen outstanding sales performers use them to win and win again. I know that these ideas still work. And I know that by revisiting the four key ideas that revolutionized selling in the twentieth century, we will learn how to sell more effectively today.

Professional selling is truly a recent innovation. A little over a century ago, nobody knew how to approach the task of selling goods and services to another business or how to sell to a government agency. There was nothing that even approached the systematic, efficient sales methods that we take for granted today. Even retail sales from a local business to a consumer was a haphazard affair.

Modern professional selling had to be invented. It took the creative genius of certain individuals to articulate the best ways to qualify customers, develop a selling proposition, and close business.

This book presents the ideas of four figures that I think can truly be called giants because of the innovations they first developed—John Henry Patterson, Dale Carnegie, Elmer Wheeler, and Joe Girard. And yet, of those four individuals, the only familiar name today is Carnegie’s, even among people who make their living in sales.

Schoolchildren recognize the names of the Wright brothers, of course, and Edison and Bell. Some people recognize the names of Turing and Shockley as key figures in the development of the modern computer.

But Patterson? Wheeler? Girard?

“Never heard of ’em!”

The fact is that in our society, selling has never been treated seriously as a core part of business operations. Marketing gets plenty of recognition, and advertising has a lot of glamour. Management? Oh, yeah, that’s very important.

But sales? I don’t think so.

In fact, there were a lot of business gurus running around just a few years ago predicting the end of selling as we know it. It was doomed.

SOME THINGS ARE FOREVER

It seems funny from our vantage point, but as recently as five years ago, business experts were predicting that the profession of sales would soon be obsolete. According to these gurus, traditional face-to-face selling had no future.

I’m not talking about isolated figures, either. These were some of the best and brightest stars on the business scene. There was a whole set of books that appeared during the late 1990s and on up through 2002 that argued that the rise of the Internet would inevitably mean the decline of sales.

The basic message of these books and articles was always the same: We were on the threshold of a bright new world, one in which technology would bring customers and vendors into direct, close, personal contact. The results were going to be spectacular, too. Happier customers. Greater profits. Increased market share. Stronger customer loyalty. Greater efficiency. Wow! Sounds cool, as a Web developer might put it.

However, the truth is that professional selling is just as important as it has ever been. In fact, in some industries, where commoditization has generated tremendous pressure on profit margins, selling value and communicating differentiators is absolutely vital. Companies that have flirted with the idea of selling over the Internet know that the Web is a powerful tool that offers a limited set of customers the opportunity to engage in a digital form of “catalog shopping.” They also know that without a strong, sales-oriented infrastructure, no business that sells products or services to consumers, to other businesses, or to the government is going to survive. No matter how hard we try to “foster community” through our web site, the reality is that people bond with people. And no matter how sophisticated our use of Internet technology may be, with mass customization creating a personalized experience and collaborative filtering targeting customers with optional products or services that they are likely to find appealing, the fact remains that in a competitive selling situation, you need professional salespeople.

No, the Internet hasn’t changed everything, in spite of the predictions of the business and technology gurus of the past decade. Some things changed, sure, but professional sales remains a vitally important part of our economy. A lot of us buy books and other stuff on Amazon. A lot of people enjoy browsing around eBay, the world’s biggest garage sale. Companies use their web sites to transact business, and sometimes, as in the case of Dell, for example, they do it very effectively. My own career was based largely on developing software applications to help salespeople do their jobs faster and better, so I have a heartfelt enthusiasm for the value of computer-based applications in the sales and marketing arena, particularly those that run over the Internet. But the reality is that nothing has replaced the role of a talented, motivated, properly trained salesperson. And nothing will.

DÉJÀ VU ALL OVER AGAIN

Mark Twain once learned while he was in London that papers in the United States were publishing his obituary. In the interests of accuracy, he sent the American press a telegram: “Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.”

Salespeople might feel justified in sending a similar message. But that experience happened to Twain only once. Oddly enough, this isn’t the first time so-called experts have predicted that selling would become irrelevant.

Back in 1916, a reporter for the New York Times asked, “Are salesmen necessary?” His theory was that advertising was so efficient, companies didn’t need a sales force any longer. Traditional face-to-face selling was doomed because it was too inefficient and too expensive. Advertising, based on the latest research into psychology, would eliminate the need for any salespeople at all.

Earlier, professor Walter Dill Scott of Northwestern University had argued that in the modern world (“modern” is relative—he was writing in 1904), advertising had “superseded the market-place, and is, in many cases, displacing the commercial traveler.” Salesmen would still be needed to go out and take orders from customers, but their role in persuading customers to buy, in articulating customers’ needs and desires, was no longer important.

Sounds kind of familiar, doesn’t it?

Admittedly, advertising made some amazing advances in the first couple of decades of the last century. Before then, advertising had been a rather primitive affair. Few people even had a clear idea of what it was supposed to accomplish, much less how to go about it. If pressed, advertising people at the turn of the century would say that the goal of advertising was to keep the name of your company or your product in front of the public.

A couple of things happened to change that. One was the emergence of new agencies that were more bottom-line-focused. Albert Lasker, a partner at Lord & Thomas, had great success writing ad copy for some of the agency’s clients, particularly a hearing aid company. But why were his ads working? What was going on in the ads that made them effective? Even Lasker didn’t know, although he knew that it had to be more than just putting the firm’s name before the public.

Lasker found the answer to his question in 1904 when John E. Kennedy, a copywriter for Grape-Nuts, Postum, and Dr. Shoop’s Family Medicine, sent a note up to the offices of Lord & Thomas from the saloon downstairs. The note said in part, “I can tell you what advertising is. I know you don’t know. It will mean much to me to have you know what it is and it will mean much to you.” Lasker bit. He invited Kennedy up and wanted to know what Kennedy’s definition was.

Kennedy’s answer: “Advertising is salesmanship in print.”

What Kennedy had identified was the fundamental purpose of advertising: to move products. If an ad didn’t cause consumers to buy, it wasn’t good advertising. Kennedy also had another concept, which he called “Reason-Why Advertising.” In other words, every ad should give the reader a reason why he or she should buy the product. Lasker quickly hired Kennedy and had him train other copywriters at Lord & Thomas in his techniques. He also adopted Kennedy’s ideas for testing ads and tracking results. All in all, this marked the birth of the modern advertising industry, as Lord & Thomas became the most influential agency in all of America.

For all their success, neither Lasker nor Kennedy thought that advertising could replace sales. Rather, they saw it as an adjunct to the sales operations that a company already had in place. But as advertising copy became more and more like a sales pitch, some people speculated that it might make the salesperson unnecessary. If you added in the research coming out of psychology labs in American universities, it seemed that the poor consumer would be virtually helpless against the persuasive power of a well-written ad.

If you then combined all of that with the growth of mail-order houses like Sears Roebuck and Montgomery Ward at the turn of the century, the roles of both the salesperson and the local retailer were called into question. According to historian Daniel Boorstin, the rise of mail-order business was a “triumph” of national enterprises over small, local businesses. Moreover, “it spelled the defeat of the salesman by advertising.”

Wait a minute—haven’t we heard all of this before? As Yogi Berra said, this is déjà vu all over again.

The rise of mail-order shopping didn’t spell the defeat of selling in America. It did herald the emergence of a new model for doing business, one based on rising prosperity, reliable railroad service, and universal postal delivery. But the defeat of the salesperson? No. Just take a look at the numbers: According to figures collected by the U.S. Census Bureau in 2000, out of a total working population in the United States of 130 million people, approximately 15 million men and women make their living in sales. That’s almost 12 percent of the entire workforce. For a profession that is supposedly in decline, it seems to be pretty darn healthy.

“I DON’T GET NO RESPECT”

Sales continues to be the engine that makes commerce move forward. There’s an old cliché: If nobody sells, nobody works. It remains as true today as it ever was.

In fact, in today’s high-tech environment, sales may be more important than ever. Back in the 1990s, Gil Cargill, a former IBM sales rep and a leading sales consultant and trainer, coined the phrase “high tech with high touch” to describe what he saw as the right direction for the rapidly emerging field of sales force automation. His point was clear: As our working world becomes increasingly dehumanized by the use of computer-based tools, people value meaningful human contact more than ever. This is somewhat ironic, given the predictions of the Internet gurus. However, it seems to be true that the more dependent we become on technology, the more we crave human interaction.

But this leads to a perplexing question: Why isn’t sales respected?

Schools of business in universities all across the country offer courses in marketing and advertising. In fact, many of them let students major in those fields. But almost none of them offer courses in selling.

Why?

Is it too mundane? Too close to hands-on work? Is there a sense that selling is not a proper academic subject for rigorous study? I truly don’t know the answer. Even in special programs where selling is either an important component—business management, for example, or programs in entrepreneurship, where the obvious career path will require an understanding of the sales organization or may even require the student to do some selling—actual courses in sales are missing. What about outside the business school? Same thing. For example, if you look at the typical course offerings in speech communication departments, the classes are filled with people who are much more likely to find careers in selling than they are in broadcasting. And yet selling is not covered.

I think a compelling argument can be made that sales is the quintessential American profession. The fact that it is largely ignored in the field of higher education is inexplicable. It’s a fundamental part of contemporary culture. Everywhere around the world, one of the dominant stereotypes associated with Americans is the image of the assertive, clever salesperson.

American fiction, plays, and movies have reinforced this stereotype, often in a negative way. The best-known salesman in American literature is Willy Loman, the character in Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, whose career involved traveling “way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine.” Even though Miller’s play is more about the damaged relationship between Willy and his son, it is often taken as a commentary on the dysfunctional nature of the traveling salesman in general. A more explicit portrait of sales at its worse—venal con men engaging in deceptions and distortions, lying to their customers and themselves, vulgar, lost, utterly without hope—is delivered in David Mamet’s Glengarry Glen Ross. The corrosive scramble for leads, good leads that these salesmen can twist into closed deals, makes real estate sales look like a sure path to hell. The shady world of aluminum siding sales doesn’t fare much better in Tin Men, and the “investments” being sold in Boiler Room result in federal racketeering charges. There are other unflattering portraits of the salesperson elsewhere in American literature—in Herman Melville’s The Confidence Man, for example, in Eugene O’Neill’s The Iceman Cometh, and in Eudora Welty’s “Death of a Traveling Man.”

(Continues…)Excerpted from The Giants of Sales by Tom Sant. Copyright © 2006 Tom Sant. Excerpted by permission of AMACOM.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.