
The Dignity of Dependence: A Feminist Manifesto
Author(s): Leah Libresco Sargeant (Author)
- Publisher: University of Notre Dame Press
- Publication Date: October 1, 2025
- Language: English
- Print length: 232 pages
- ISBN-10: 0268210330
- ISBN-13: 9780268210335
Book Description
The Dignity of Dependence argues that women’s equal rights depend on advocating for women as women.
The world is not ready to welcome women as women; a culture that fears dependence and asks everyone to aim for autonomy and independence will always be a society hostile to women. Women are expected to care for those around them while living in a society that despises need and penalizes those who care for the weak.
The Dignity of Dependence aims to liberate women and men from this corrosive and false ideal of the human person as strongest alone. Leah Libresco Sargeant argues that to thrive, human beings need to exist in webs of mutual dependence, not in isolating, radical autonomy. Women’s equal dignity doesn’t require women to deny biological reality or attempt to be interchangeable with men. Sargeant advocates for building a culture that accepts and celebrates women as they are rather than demanding that women keep their relationships and their bodies in check. The fight for women’s dignity is a fight for a full, human dignity―a dignity that isn’t threatened by dependence. It is our need for each other that makes us human.
Editorial Reviews
Review
“In contrast to the prevailing “feminism of freedom,” the “feminism of care” promoted by Sargeant and her contemporaries like Mary Harrington promotes the holistic well-being of women in the context of their relationships, particularly motherhood. The Dignity of Dependence deserves a place on the shelf of anyone interested in this developing school of thought.” ―Fare Forward
“In this atmosphere, it’s remarkable to hear an influential conservative voice calling for more, not less, feminization. . . . But her overarching message to put others first, as women so often do, is a much-needed antidote to the celebration of the masculine and denigration of the feminine that have become a hallmark of the right.” ―The Atlantic
“What Sargeant invites is fundamentally a change of mind first before a practical set of actions. . . . Her insight deserves an especially wide hearing, especially if Christians can proclaim it with right emphasis: less servant leadership as claimed by people more interested in the ‘leadership’ part, and more outright service. Less self-sufficiency and more self-gift. We all bear dignity. We all need help.” ―Christianity Today
“Ultimately, Sargeant’s book is not just a challenge to the direction of contemporary feminism, which seeks the obliteration of gender norms altogether, but a challenge to a philosophical trend that places agency above all other goods. . . . While Sargeant suggests certain policy changes that would better reflect this human reality, her project is ultimately a philosophical one. As she writes in the first chapter, ‘No just society can be built on the basis of a false anthropology.’ This book is a crucial contribution to rebuilding that foundation.” ―Washington Free Beacon
“Sargeant has provided an essential alternative to feminist ideals that efface womanhood, and The Dignity of Dependence should be assigned on every college campus in the country. This book is a much-needed antidote to the poisonous alienation between the sexes that besets our culture.” ―The Federalist
“What Leah Libresco Sargeant’s new book encourages the reader to consider is that dependence, properly understood, actually goes far deeper, and that self-sufficiency is, essentially, a kind of mirage. In its moral imagination and clear-eyed assessment of the reality of what it means to be human, The Dignity of Dependence inherits and builds upon the best tradition of Christian radicalism.” ―Family Matters
“Sargeant’s book is a must-read not only for those involved in feminist discourse, but for anybody concerned with creating a kinder and more inclusive society.” ―Institute for Family Studies
“So, yes, to the dignity of dependence. Can we grab hold of it? Can we honour it? When we do so, especially as women, we may find the trajectory of an autonomous, expedient, falsely independent and efficient-in-all-the-wrong-ways world actually changes. To this end, may the readership for Sargeant’s book be large and appreciative.” ―The Catholic Register
“Sargeant blends personal anecdote with policy discussion and cultural commentary. . . . The resulting book is something akin to a phenomenology of everyday vulnerability and love.” ―First Things
“The Dignity of Dependence makes a nuanced argument not only about a better model of feminism but also about the importance of a proper anthropology to ground our politics and economics.” ―Religion & Liberty
“The Dignity of Dependence provides a window into Leah Libresco Sargeant’s beautiful mind, allowing us to see the world as she sees it and to imagine we can become the men and women she believes we can be. This magnificent book is a love letter, not only to her own beloved husband and children, but to all women, all children, and all men, too. A humane and dignified vision of how men, women, and children can thrive together, as the kinds of beings we are, with plenty of space for the most vulnerable among us.” ―Erika Bachiochi, author of The Rights of Women
“[The Dignity of Dependence] is a manifesto for another kind of feminism, laying out both an overarching vision (especially in the opening pages), one discomfiting to the political left and right alike, and the concrete particulars, the decisions and values and policy choices, necessary to implement it. . . . The book is a culmination and synthesis of [Sargeant’s] public writing for more than a decade.” ―Arc: Religion, Politics, Et Cetera
“Instead of attempting to erase the innate biological differences which make women more dependent, Libresco Sargeant calls for husbands and extended family to participate in caregiving, thus dignifying women’s dependence.” ―The Critic
“[I]f truth is not relative, as Sargeant argues it isn’t, then men and women truly need each other for not only survival but sanctification. And they need a society that sees them for what they are: fully human.” ―Commonplace
“Sargeant skewers the modern notion that fulfillment is to be found in unencumbered selfhood and in taking on only freely chosen obligations.” ―National Review
“Even if it is not a good in itself, dependence is surely part of the human condition, and there is much to gain from deeper reflection on that theme. By leading readers into those waters, The Dignity of Dependence has made a real contribution, not only to feminism, but to broader conversations about the foundations of a thriving culture.” ―Law & Liberty
“This is a beautifully written book with a compelling message about the limits of autonomy as a social ideal. A strength of this book is its broad interdisciplinary scope.” ―The Catholic Weekly
“As a manifesto, [The Dignity of Dependence] offers a clear way of bridging the gender divide that is leaving so many outwardly independent people lonely and isolated.” ―The Irish Times
“All humans are at one time or other dependent; total independence is not only undesirable, it’s impossible, and to pretend anything else is denying reality. “Our ties to others are not an obstacle to self-actualization, but the foundation for the authentic self.” The Dignity of Dependence is a challenging read but also a thoughtful one, and a thoroughly human one.” ―World
“In a world that increasingly expects individuals to choose personal convenience over tethering to others, The Dignity of Dependence reminds us that dependence and its ability to anchor us to reality is essential to our humanity. . . . By choosing to live for someone else, we subject ourselves to the reality Sargeant speaks of and can reap the rich personal rewards it offers.” ―Civitas Outlook
“In a cultural moment obsessed with self-optimisation and individual achievement, The Dignity of Dependence offers a necessary corrective. It invites readers to rethink what it means to be strong, free, and fully human. Sargeant’s vision is not nostalgic or regressive―it’s a bold call to build communities and policies that reflect the truth of our shared vulnerability. This is a manifesto that does not shout. It persuades through clarity, compassion, and a profound respect for the human person.” ―Lodestar
About the Author
Leah Libresco Sargeant works on family policy in Washington, DC. She is the author of Building the Benedict Option and Arriving at Amen. She runs the Substack community Other Feminisms.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The world is the wrong shape for women… It’s not just that my body is the “wrong” shape or size. As a woman, I am smaller than most men, but as a person, I am too big because my identity extends too far beyond my own body. In pregnancy, my bulk is obvious, but after the umbilical cord is cut, I am still attached, just less obviously. Women, more than men, are physically marked by relationships of care. There is the care that only I can provide―blood for a baby in utero, milk for the child taking her first steps, a chest for her to lay her head upon and hear the familiar lub-dub of my heartbeat―the first sound she knew. But beyond that, there is care that I want to provide, which is disvalued and distrusted because it is technically possible to delegate.
Women’s bodies and relationships are shaped by dependence, which makes us exceptional and unwelcome in a world that expects men and women to be autonomous (or at least to pretend to be). A world that is unwilling to acknowledge dependence as foundational to human life is unable to treat women as equal in dignity to men. It can make space for women only insofar as they find ways to hide or ameliorate the problem of being women, which is to say, the problem of being tied to those who depend on us. Women’s bodies are treated as strange and abnormal because we are not cleanly divisible from the world around us and the people who depend on us. We are not “buffered” but are porous, with a fuzzy boundary between our self and the other. Our openness is written on our bodies during pregnancy, when a mother and her child exchange blood through the placenta.
There is not a direct connection where the mother’s blood vessels plug into her baby’s circulatory system. Rather, the smallest capillaries of mother and child lie tangent to each other, and nutrients and oxygen diffuse across the gap. The most intimate connection still involves a small separation. In our other human relationships of care, the space between us isn’t measured in micrometers. There is more freedom to move, but that means that caregivers also must commit to a more active choice to sustain the one who depends on them. Because we are human, we still belong to each other, even when our bodies are not directly entangled.
Only women make these connections viscerally and literally, by lending our blood and our bodies to a child. Men also respond to the need of the vulnerable, but the shape their self-gift takes is different. In a full and flourishing life, a man’s ties to those who need him make it obvious that he is not solely his self. But many men and women live more narrowly, shortchanged by believing in a narrow definition of “normal” life as autonomous life. When human beings and human bodies are expected to exist in isolation, women and men are asked to prune the connections that tie us to others. What makes us most human, the dependence in which we all begin our lives, is viewed as strange and passing―a problem to get over.
(excerpted from chapter 1)
Wow! eBook


