Emerson and Self-Reliance

There is no recent study that so convincingly shows that Emerson anticipates (and rivals) Nietzsche as a sustained practitioner of multiple perspectivism and that Emersonian self-reliance is therefore ‘not one particular substantive or doctrinal principle like other ones.’ In this and other ways, Kateb has deepened, and usefully complicated, our understanding of Emerson. — Richard F. Teichgraber III ― American Literature

By emphasizing mental self-reliance Kateb reasserts Emerson the Transcendentalist and makes a compelling case for the political importance of this dimension of Emerson’s thought. . . . For [Kateb] Emerson’s construction of self-reliance serves as a vital, but problematic, model that political philosophers can situate as both the foundation and the consummation of a theory of democratic civil society. — T. Gregory Garver ― College English

Emerson, in George Kateb’s engagingly lucid and compelling account, is the American Shakespeare. Kateb justifies this bold claim by demonstrating the poetic amplitude, incisiveness, impersonality, and authority of Emerson’s thought. With Emerson, to be sure, the dramatist’s characters are replaced by ideas, and one idea―’self-reliance’―dominates all the rest. The chief imperative for citizens of a democracy, according to Kateb’s Emerson, is a steady effort to think one’s own thoughts and to think them through. This radical principle defines the philosophy of democratic individuality, a distinctively modern creed whose founding genius―Kateb persuasively reveals―was Ralph Waldo Emerson. — Leo Marx, William R. Kenan, Jr. Professor Emeritus of American Cultural History, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

An important contribution. . . . Kateb] has an excellent discussion of how antagonism and contrast lie at the heart of Emerson’s notion of identity. — Sharon Cameron ― Critical Inquiry