The Biotechnology Debate: Democracy in the Face of Intractable Disagreement: 29 2012th Edition

The Biotechnology Debate: Democracy in the Face of Intractable Disagreement: 29 2012th Edition book cover

The Biotechnology Debate: Democracy in the Face of Intractable Disagreement: 29 2012th Edition

Author(s): Bernice Bovenkerk (Author)

  • Publisher: Springer
  • Publication Date: 5 Jan. 2012
  • Edition: 2012th
  • Language: English
  • Print length: 356 pages
  • ISBN-10: 9400726902
  • ISBN-13: 9789400726901

Book Description

This book grounds deliberative democratic theory in a more refined understanding of deliberative practice, in particular when dealing with intractable moral disagreement regarding novel technologies. While there is an ongoing, vibrant debate about the theoretical merits of deliberative democracy on the one hand, and more recently, empirical studies of specific deliberative exercises have been carried out, these two discussions fail to speak to one another.

Debates about animal and plant biotechnology are examined as a paradigmatic case for intractable disagreement in today’s pluralistic societies. This examination reveals that the disagreements in this debate are multi-faceted and multi-dimensional and can often be traced to fundamental disagreements about values or worldviews.

“One of the acute insights to emerge from this examination is that deliberation can serve different purposes vis-à-vis different types of problem.  In the case of deeply unstructured problems, like the modern biotechnology debate, the aim of inclusion is more appropriate than the aim of consensus. This book highlights the importance of political culture and broader institutional settings in shaping the capacity and propensity of citizens to engage in deliberation and the degree to which governments are prepared to relinquish authority to deliberative mini-publics.”

Robyn Eckersley, University of Melbourne, Australia

Editorial Reviews

From the Back Cover

This book grounds deliberative democratic theory in a more refined understanding of deliberative practice, in particular when dealing with intractable moral disagreement regarding novel technologies. While there is an ongoing, vibrant debate about the theoretical merits of deliberative democracy on the one hand, and more recently, empirical studies of specific deliberative exercises have been carried out, these two discussions fail to speak to one another.

Debates about animal and plant biotechnology are examined as a paradigmatic case for intractable disagreement in today’s pluralistic societies. This examination reveals that the disagreements in this debate are multi-faceted and multi-dimensional and can often be traced to fundamental disagreements about values or worldviews.

“One of the acute insights to emerge from this examination is that deliberation can serve different purposes vis-à-vis different types of problem. In the case of deeply unstructured problems, like the modern biotechnology debate, the aim of inclusion is more appropriate than the aim of consensus. This book highlights the importance of political culture and broader institutional settings in shaping the capacity and propensity of citizens to engage in deliberation and the degree to which governments are prepared to relinquish authority to deliberative mini-publics.”

Robyn Eckersley, University of Melbourne, Australia

View on Amazon

电子书代发PDF格式价格30我要求助
未经允许不得转载:Wow! eBook » The Biotechnology Debate: Democracy in the Face of Intractable Disagreement: 29 2012th Edition